This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: top level: make more dependencies explicit
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:45:40PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:09:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>Nathanael,
> >>
> >>FYI, I'm about to revert this change:
> >>
> >>2002-09-25 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
> >>
> >> * Makefile.tpl: Make subsituted variables more autoconfy.
> >> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> >> * configure: Make seds more autoconfy.
> >>
> >>It breaks both the GDB and BINUITLS snapshot processes. Details to
> >>follow, however, suggest a short pause.
> >
> >Uh... yuck.
> >
> >Are there some details on the GDB and BINUTILS snapshot processes so that
> >I can fix *them*? This change is going to happen eventually, even if
> >it's reverted for now; the Makefile changes will be necessary for
> >autoonfiscation.
> >
> >Wait, let me look at Makefile.in...
> >
> >Ewwwww. The taz rules use Makefile.in *as a Makefile*.
> >That's the root of the problem, isn't it? Incidentally, that's
> >disgusting. :-)
>
> Well I think ``SHELL = @config_shell@'' is ugly :-) Why can't the
> configury code edit ``s/^SHELL =.*/SHELL = $.../''.
Because that's disgusting? Having something which doesn't look like a
configury-overridden variable be edited in configure is very fragile.
> The mechanism is very old (it pre-dates me as GDB release engineer).
> Changing it is going to involve updates to many things - snapshot
> scripts, release process doco, .... so won't happen overnight.
GCC has had a separate script to make releases for years and years.
It's time GDB and Binutils did the same.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer