This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Binutils 2.13 branch created


On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:45:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> The host is Debian unstable (glibc 2.2.5 + some patches) and the system
> compiler is gcc 2.95 + some patches.  It shows up when configured for
> --enable-targets=all --enable-64-bit-bfd and using the system compiler.

It works fine for me with gc 2.96.

> 
> It does _not_ show up when using GCC 3.1 and a simple default
> (../src/configure) toolchain.  The two tests in cdtest fail because of
> certain inconsistencies in the way the testsuite selects a compiler,
> but that's not a real failure.  It also does not show up for a GCC 3.1
> --enable-targets=all --enable-64-bit-bfd build, or for a GCC 2.95 single-target build.
> 
> I suspect we are triggering a bug in 2.95.x's long long handling :(  If

It is very possible. gcc 2.96 had to be fixed to handle binutils with
64bit bfd. There is even a check to disallow egcs-1.1.2 for 64bit BFD.
Maybe, we should add gcc 2.95.x :-).


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]