This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: powerpc64 and "nm -C"
- From: Elias Athanasopoulos <eathan at otenet dot gr>
- To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:31:48 +0300
- Subject: Re: powerpc64 and "nm -C"
- References: <20020626132058.GW22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020626202253.D1131@neutrino.particles.org> <20020627050956.GC22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020702041951.GA22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:49:51PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:39:56PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:22:53PM +0300, Elias Athanasopoulos wrote:
> > > Just a thought: wouldn't be better to embed this functionality in
> > > the demangler, since it [the demangler] is not used only by nm?
> > Yes, you're right. Perhaps we should use a bfd_demangle function.
> Then again, perhaps not. Things that go in bfd ought not abort when
> running out of memory.
:-) Actually, *this* is what I have at first in my mind. Patching
libiberty or creating a wrapper. Nice work.