This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question

From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
To: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, schwab at suse dot de,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question

> Note to Steve: -l not -I !  I was curious as to whether the segment
> map changed.  If it didn't then no matter.

Oops, I guess I need a better font in my mailer.  It looks like the
segment map did change, at least a little, ".bortext" is missing from
segment 04 and .note is missing from 08.  I have no idea what this
means, I don't recall ever seeing a .bortext section before.

Old (pre-strip):

 Section to Segment mapping:
  Segment Sections...
   00
   01     .IA_64.unwind_hdr .IA_64.unwind .IA_64.unwind_info
   02     .interp
   03     .dynamic
   04     .dynamic .dynsym .dynstr .hash .rela.plt .IA_64.unwind_hdr .IA_64.unwind .IA_64.unwind_info .rodata .interp .dynhash .text .bortext
   05     .plt .dlt .sbss .bss
   06
   07
   08     .note
   09

New (after running strip):

 Section to Segment mapping:
  Segment Sections...
   00
   01     .IA_64.unwind_hdr .IA_64.unwind .IA_64.unwind_info
   02     .interp
   03     .dynamic
   04     .dynamic .dynsym .dynstr .hash .rela.plt .IA_64.unwind_hdr .IA_64.unwind .IA_64.unwind_info .rodata .interp .dynhash .text
   05     .plt .dlt .sbss .bss
   06
   07
   08
   09

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]