This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: selective[1245] xfail on x86-64

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 20:48:26 +0930
Subject: Re: selective[1245] xfail on x86-64
References: <jesn4bymlt.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <m3ptzdykna.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:50:33AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hmm - well at the very least I think that you ought to add a comment
> as well, explaining that it is relocs in the .eh_frame section that
> are keeping the redundant symbols in the executables.  It would also
> be good to add a FIXME note to the x86_64 sources somewhere saying
> that this ought to be corrected some day.

It's not specific to x86_64.  I see the same thing on powerpc64, and
I think other targets will suffer the same problem.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: selective[1245] xfail on x86-64
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- selective[1245] xfail on x86-64
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: selective[1245] xfail on x86-64
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]