This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: binutils

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: C Sares <saresc at hotmail dot com>, nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 14 May 2002 09:51:17 -0700
Subject: Re: binutils
References: <F137Y9sxusY5HgComKb00006d70@hotmail.com><20020514091109.A5895@lucon.org>

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> You can't convert coff executable to ELF. It is not going to work without
> extensive changes in binutils.

Why not?  Provided it is statically linked, and is laid out in memory
to only require a couple of program segments.

You can't convert a COFF object to ELF, but why can't you convert an
executable?

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: binutils
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Re: binutils
  - From: C Sares
- Re: binutils
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]