This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
* Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> on Sat, May 11, 2002: > On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:15:38PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > Today I noticed that bfd.h gets installed under $prefix/include instead > > I question whether we should be installing any of these files by > default. Which projects using libbfd don't provide their own > copy of bfd? > A lot of smaller, "single-target" applications do, mostly loader utilities for embedded platforms. Also a few disassemblers. I don't see why the installed libbfd should be removed if it's currently not breaking anything. Including bfd in these projects would be overkill. M. R.
Attachment:
msg00204/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |