This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: problem of porting gas
- From: "David Zhang" <davidzhl at hotmail dot com>
- To: nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:27:19 +0000
- Subject: Re: problem of porting gas
- Bcc:
Hi Nick,
First thanks for your reply.
>Is the "mipsx3" a MIPS processor variant ? If so you might want to
>consider starting with the current mips target rather than the mmix.
Yes, MIPSX3 is a MIPS processor variant. But I find the gas MIPS is too
complicated to integrate the MIPSX3 in it. Although the codes of
tc-mipsx3.* is originated from tc-mips.*, I think treating MIPSX3 as a new
processor maybe somewhat easier.
I have rename tc-mipsx3.c/tc-mipsx3.h to tc-mips.c/tc-mips.h in order to
compile the porting codes.
bash#./configure --target=mips-big-aout
I got a new "as" that can translate asm codes to binary codes. But it
generates coff file, what I want is aout. This situation also confused me
so much.
>Did you run "autoconf" (after changing configure.in) and then
>"automake" (after changing Makefile.am) in the gas source directory ?
>These tools create the "configure" and "Makefile.in" files
>respectively which are what are actually used when configuring gas.
surely. I had run "autoconf" and "automake" before doing "./configure"
Best regards
David.Z
_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger：
http://messenger.microsoft.com/cn