This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: libiberty packaging troubles
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 13:46:49 +0100
- Subject: Re: libiberty packaging troubles
- References: <20020228225904.GA26603@compsoc.man.ac.uk><20020228182445.A24995@nevyn.them.org><20020301012758.GA30910@compsoc.man.ac.uk><20020301015154.A6408@nevyn.them.org><20020301071841.GC1059@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> writes:
|> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:51:54AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
|> >
|> > A binary incompatible change in libbfd probably goes in every month at
|> > the least.
|>
|> For the benefit on anyone submitting patches, any such change is
|> supposed to trigger an increase in the bfd version number.
|> (bfd/configure.in:AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE)
|>
|> Since we're on 2.12.90, I guess Daniel's assertion implies a 2.13.0
|> release in under 10 months. ;-)
Why? In 10 months we just have 2.12.100.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."