This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ Bug-Squashing Party #7 report]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:31:11AM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-02-20 at 00:32, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > As I am trying to push binutils 2.12 (prerelease, at least) out within
> > > the next two weeks, I'd appreciate details...  Does it at least show up
> > > in the ld testsuite?
> > 
> > Not from what I gather.  My ARM isn't running yet, so Philip will have to
> > provide more info on that front.
> I haven't actually checked yet but I'd be surprised if it shows up in
> the testsuite.
> Here's a testcase in C.  Compile it with "gcc -fPIC".  The number it
> prints should be a valid address - the exact value isn't very exciting,
> so long as it isn't zero.
> [ For those just tuning in, more details of this bug are at:
> ]

Tell me more.  Apparently both you and Chris can reproduce this, but I

Relocation section '' at offset 0x294 contains 2 entries:
 Offset     Info    Type            Symbol's Value  Symbol's Name
0001068c  00000615 R_ARM_GLOB_DAT        000084e0  foo           

This is using the 2.12 branch.  Maybe it's something introduced in HJ's

Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]