This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
line number missing in get_nearest_line
- From: Yannick PERRET <yperret at bat710 dot univ-lyon1 dot fr>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:47:48 +0100
- Subject: line number missing in get_nearest_line
- Organization: UFR Info - Universite Claude Bernard Lyon1
Hi again.
I wrote in a previous mail about a kind of bug that
make bfd_get_nearest_line to always return '0'
for the line number.
I find where is the problem:
in the debug informations (as given by objdump -g),
no file/line information are given for function headers,
as it is the case for program lines:
(...)
void f ()
{ /* 0x80483f0 */
/* file toto.c line 6 addr 0x80483f6 */
/* file .toto.c line 7 addr 0x80483f6 */
/* file toto.c line 8 addr 0x8048406 */
/* file toto.c line 9 addr 0x8048416 */
/* file toto.c line 10 addr 0x8048426 */
/* file toto.c line 11 addr 0x8048436 */
} /* 0x804843a */
(...)
It seems that bfd_get_nearest_line find well the
nearest "/* (...) addr */" for a given symbol
address, but in the case of function addresses
(here 0x80483f0 for f()) the line is discarded.
->
addr2line --functions --basename -e toto 0x8048406
f
toto.c:8
addr2line --functions --basename -e toto 0x80483f0
f
toto.c:0
How can I correct this problem ?
By the way, with gcc V2.95.2 (I'm now using gcc v2.95.3)
this problem never occur. Do the debug format stored
in object changed ?
Thank you for any help.
Regards,
--
Yannick