This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: sh-hms does not build on the release branch


Am Fre, 2002-02-15 um 20.03 schrieb Daniel Jacobowitz:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:46:17PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > 
> > Nothing weird on this failure. :)
> > 
> > sh-coff, sh-elf, sh-rtems, sh-rtemself all build OK
> > 
> > sh-hms fails trying to link gas with an undefined
> > reference to md_pcrel_from in fixup_segment() in
> > the file obj-coff.c:4397
> > 
> > With a quick glance, I don't see anything special
> > for sh-hms not even a configure stanza.  It must 
> > be using some default sh-*-* that is not the same
> > as sh-coff.  But my grep for sh-*-* shows it often
> > on the same line as sh-rtems so I am perplexed.
> 
> Ah, I suspected it might not build.  sh-hms confuses me.  I see
> configure triplets for it being added in the changelogs, but I don't
> see when they disappeared again.  It appears to be a COFF target, but
> unlike sh-elf and sh-coff bfd_gas is never set.  That may be the
> problem....
sh-hms had been the sh-coff GNU-toolchain variant provided by/for
Hitachi (hms = Hitachi Micro Systems). IIRC [1], except for the name,
there had not been any differences to sh-coff in binutils and only very
few minor differences in gcc/newlib.

> Is sh-hms still a supported target?
Dunno. 

Ralf

[1] I had used it, when getting started with SH1s ca. 4-5 years ago and
still have 



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]