This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr?

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:36:28 +0100
Subject: Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr?
References: <20020213164338.A6112@lucon.org> <20020214090239.C798@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20020214122012.A10385@lucon.org>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:20:12PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> I don't know what the best way to fix it is. Given the problem I see
> on Linux/mips, I don't know how well your scheme will work on other
> platforms. The key is you have to make sure the .eh_frame_hdr section
> needs no run-time relocation or provide the relocation records for it. 
> I believe you should require the .eh_frame_hdr section needs no
> run-time relocation.

.eh_frame_hdr never needs any run-time relocation.
It always uses pcrel encoding.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr?
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]