This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:41:21 -0800
Subject: Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
References: <20020211164829.A3992@disaster.basement.lan> <m3adufznnt.fsf@myware.mynet> <20020211170949.A4165@disaster.basement.lan>

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 05:09:49PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> Would a patch to rename lang_new_vers_regex() be acceptable?

Should be ok.

> > This is more or less encoding the current practice.  No special reason
> > to have it like this except that there might be problems with the
> > grammar.  Somebody will have to check it.
> 
> AFAICT this lexer token is only used in this one place.  As long as it
> doesn't match a leading colon or a trailing semicolon there shouldn't be
> any grammar conflicts.  I will try some modifications.

Maybe we should accept strings here for these more complicated globs?
Or would that just be confusing?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]