This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: 2.12 branch will be cut on Saturday
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 04:20:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 09:16:18AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> writes:
> > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:59:05PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 06:21:45PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >> > Testing the branch is always greatly appreciated. I know of some
> > >> > Windows (DLL-related) problems, and some Sparc problems, and the
> > >>
> > >> What are the known sparc problems?
> > >
> > > Christian Jönsson has been posting Sparc-linux testresults for several
> > > weeks now. If you scroll down in them you'll see a few elf failures in
> > > LD.
> > Search the archives - there was some discussion between HJ and myself
> > and we conclude that some of the tests are invalid but so far none of
> > the SPARC maintainers commented on this...
> It appears that these are different failures than the ones you were
Well, I think an important factor in the testing is not only binutils
version, but gcc and glibc version as well.
E.g. I've just run make check on sparc-redhat-linux on todays checkout
and the only failure I got was:
FAIL: S-records with constructors
This is Aurora (RHL 7.2 SPARC port) distro, gcc-2.96-RH (2.96-102),