This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:38:04 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On 8 Feb 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> > > Is that an agreement to keep it in "sh" and keeping it out of
> > > sh[1-4]{le,be} ?
> >
> > How's this? Ok to install? If I don't read objections, I'll check it
> > in soon.
>
> I have no objections to that patch.
(That is,
<URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00277.html>)
... except that it broke sh-elf, because the corresponding bfd
changes weren't done. When linking objdump:
../opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(sh64-dis.o): In function
`sh64_get_contents_type_disasm':
opcodes/sh64-dis.c:481:
undefined reference to `sh64_get_contents_type'
opcodes/sh64-dis.c:495:
undefined reference to `sh64_get_contents_type'
brgds, H-P