This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:16:23 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
On 5 Feb 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2002, Andrew Cagney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Anyway, if you always include support for all the SH variants, does
> > anything break?
> Probably not, since --enable-targets=all works.
Though you'd bloat binutils for people with sh[1-4] only. Some
SH targets run native in limited systems, I've heard. Can we
ignore the bloat issue?
Maybe let sh-elf imply bfd+opcodes for sh[1-5] and leave
sh[1-4][hl]* the way it is?
(Including opcodes but not bfd seems useless. You can't get a
sh5 bfd, so you can't (without tricks) invoke the disassembler