This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] m68000 ELF + two m68k gas fixes
- From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: "Aaron J. Grier" <aaron at frye dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:47:39 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68000 ELF + two m68k gas fixes
- Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc.
- References: <200112181754.MAA27626@swan.lcs.mit.edu> <20020201083449.D13753@dr-evil> <20020201095934.U8141@aaron.internal>
- Reply-to: thorpej at wasabisystems dot com
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:59:34AM -0800, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > -m68881 | -m68882 | -mno-68881 | -mno-68882\n\
> > target has/lacks floating-point coprocessor\n\
> > ! [default yes for 68020, 68030, and cpu32]\n"));
> for what it's worth, I've always found this wording pretty ambiguous.
> "has/lacks" and "yes" don't seem to match up. perhaps
> [default lacks for 68020, 68030, and cpu32] would be more clear?
Except if you look at the code, it's "default has for 68020, 68030,
and cpu32". :-)
I'm actually inclined to leave this part alone, since it doesn't really
have anything to do with what this patch is trying to achieve.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>