This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Support %r_disp{8,16,32,64} and %r_plt{32,64} on SPARC

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: jakub at redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:25:42 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support %r_disp{8,16,32,64} and %r_plt{32,64} on SPARC
References: <20011221161205.J542@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20011221101830.C30161@redhat.com> <200112211823.fBLIN6f15858@greed.delorie.com>

On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> What's the advantage of this big %r_disp32 patch over just using
> DW_EH_PE_aligned?

No dynamic relocations.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Support %r_disp{8,16,32,64} and %r_plt{32,64} on SPARC
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Support %r_disp{8,16,32,64} and %r_plt{32,64} on SPARC
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Support %r_disp{8,16,32,64} and %r_plt{32,64} on SPARC
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Support %r_disp{8,16,32,64} and %r_plt{32,64} on SPARC
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]