This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 22:36:02 -0500
Subject: Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
References: <200112190231.fBJ2VZK08687@greed.delorie.com> <20011219132637.S29130@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200112190301.fBJ31mA16401@envy.delorie.com> <20011219135147.T29130@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>


> Making a wild guess at the problem, and solution...

Well, it made a change, but not nearly enough.  Before, the value is
something like 0x790000.  After, it's like 0x730000.  It needs to be
like 0xef790000 (the so is loaded at 0xef730000).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]