This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Better (MIPS) ELF64 archive support
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 02:16:12 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better (MIPS) ELF64 archive support
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 2001-12-04 Thiemo Seufer <seufer@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
>
> /bfd/ChangeLog
> * Makefile.am: split up BFD_LIBS like statements in BFD32_LIBS and
> BFD64_LIBS, make the latter depending on the availability of BFD64.
> Add archive64.c source file.
> * archive64.c: New file implementing bfd_elf64_archive_slurp_armap
> and bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap, code from elf64-mips.c
> * archive.c (bfd_slurp_armap): Add ELF64 archive support.
> * config.bfd (mips*-*-irix6*): Allow with BFD64 only.
> (mips64*el-*-linux*): Likewise.
> (mips*el-*-linux*): Likewise. Reorder entries.
> * configure.in (bfd_libs): Define in dependency of BFD64 and
> AC_SUBST it.
> * elf64-mips.c (mips_elf64_slurp_armap): Remove, use
> bfd_elf64_archive_slurp_armap instead.
> (mips_elf64_write_armap): Remove, use bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap
> instead.
When committing this, you forgot to regenerate Makefile.in and
configure. (Done.) Or you forgot to commit it, which is why
ChangeLog entries saying "Regenerate" is supposed to be added,
to help remembering that.
brgds, H-P