This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is the current ld brolen? (Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha)

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 10:08:57 +0100
Subject: Re: Is the current ld brolen? (Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha)
References: <20011123173728.A2144@lucon.org> <20011123220041.A1824@lucon.org> <20011123224118.A11048@lucon.org> <20011123225221.A11208@lucon.org> <20011124000635.A12354@lucon.org>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 12:06:35AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> Now I got those while building glibc 2.2.4 on Linux/x86? Jakub, have
> you tried your patch with RedHat build? Something is going on.

I just did did make check and some testing on small testcases I had.
I'll bootstrap gcc and glibc on Monday.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the current ld brolen? (Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha)
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- ld is broken on Linux/alpha
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Is the current ld brolen? (Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha)
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]