This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: More i386 architectures?
H . J . Lu writes:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:43:14AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 12:13:42PM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > >
> > > > On a related matter, is there anything in an executable indicating
> > > > which architecture an i386 binary belongs?
> > >
> > > Don't know, Sorry.
> >
> > There isn't, apart from examining the code, and we certainly don't want
> > to go down the mips path and start using flags in the ELF header for this
> > purpose. If gdb needs the info, then it could be arranged for a special
> > note to be emitted.
>
> FWIW, personally, I don't like the MIPS scheme at all. On the other
> hand, it may be just because we still don't support n32/n64 ABIs. We
> have to use all kinds of weird stuffs on MIPS.
The SH uses e_flags pretty effectively for this purpose. But if the
ix86 ABI forbids using e_flags (the ppc ABI does this) we have little
choice.
Geoff is implementing the Dwarf3 extension for this, but I would like to
see the note section as well, so that it works with stabs.
Elena
>
>
> H.J.