This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips

To: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:15:50 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010622141621.A28206@lucon.org> <993258158.6177.1.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <20010622180739.A32597@lucon.org> <993265770.6177.3.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com>

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:09:30PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Here it is.
> > 
> 
> I like it mostly.
> 
> You should probably put in a check to make sure that both -march and
> -mcpu are both not given on the command line (and different).
> 

Why? What is wrong to have both? I thought it was the whole idea.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: FYI: -march/-mcpu patch for mips
  - From: Eric Christopher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]