This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Should we remove those man pages from CVS?
- To: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Should we remove those man pages from CVS?
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:18:02 -0700
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>,binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <20010616093504.B2742@lucon.org> <m3ae371mas.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <20010617120315.A2587@lucon.org> <15149.28054.790591.497161@scooby.apac.redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:55:18PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> >>>>> "H" == H J Lu <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
>
> H> * Makefile.am (diststuff): Add $(MANS).
>
> I could not even find where "diststuff" is referenced in
> Makefile.{am,in}, but this is not the "right way" to add candidates
My ChangeLog should go into each subdirectory. See my patch.
> for `make dist'. You should use the EXTRA_DIST variable.
That is how the info pages are generated. I don't want to change it.
H.J.