This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static

To: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:09:15 -0700
Cc: John Reiser <jreiser at BitWagon dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <991410192.21718.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <3B17DE86.DBAB8D23@BitWagon.com> <20010601120832.A7786@lucon.org> <hjl@lucon.org> <E155v7j-0000YH-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:02:19PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >Please also CC your binutils bug reports to binutils@sources.redhat.com.
> >There are no archives for bug-binutils.
> 
> Not specifically, but see e.g.
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gnu-utils/2001-05/msg00357.html
> 

It is not accessible from

http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/


H.J.

References:
- bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: John Reiser
- Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: bfd.flags&DYNAMIC vs. bfd_link_info.static
  - From: Philip Blundell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]