This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] PIC support for SH
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PIC support for SH
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 22:18:12 -0600
- cc: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe at chroot dot org>, kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>you write:
> On Sep 8, 2000, NIIBE Yutaka <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> It is my understanding that Hitachi had told us to use this range.
> >> But I may be mistaken.
> > Strange. Hitachi assigned 160-167 for that, here in Japan. Perhaps,
> > there would be some dis-communication. We'll check it again too.
> There was indeed some misunderstanding. We should have used the range
> 160-167 too. Here's a patch that fixes this problem. Ok to install?
> Content-Type: text/x-patch
> Content-Disposition: inline; filename=shpic-include.patch
> Index: include/elf/ChangeLog
> from Alexandre Oliva <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> * sh.h (R_SH_GOT32, R_SH_PLT32, R_SH_COPY, R_SH_GLOB_DAT,
> R_SH_JMP_SLOT, R_SH_RELATIVE, R_SH_GOTOFF, R_SH_GOTPC): Change
> numbers to the range from 160 to 167.
> (R_SH_FIRST_INVALID_RELOC): Adjust.
> (R_SH_FIRST_INVALID_RELOC_2, R_SH_LAST_INVALID_RELOC_2):
> New relocs to fill in the gap.