This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
bfd patch for backward compatibility with older IEEE objects
- To: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: bfd patch for backward compatibility with older IEEE objects
- From: "Alexander Aganichev" <AAganichev at hypercom dot com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:24:55 +0400
Hi!
The following patch should fix reading older IEEE objects by fresh
binutils. I'm not sure, but it looks like all or a lot of m68k related
cases below the code I've added is useless.
diff -ruNd binutils-000708/bfd/ChangeLog
binutils-000708-hypercom/bfd/ChangeLog
--- binutils-000708/bfd/ChangeLog Mon Jul 10 09:38:01 2000
+++ binutils-000708-hypercom/bfd/ChangeLog Mon Jul 10 10:14:02 2000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2000-07-10 Alexander Aganichev <AAganichev@hypercom.com>
+
+ * archures.c (bfd_default_scan): Add set of bfd_mach_ cases for
+ compatibility with older binutils.
+
2000-07-08 Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
* section.c (struct sec): Add id field. Tidy comment formatting.
diff -ruNd binutils-000708/bfd/archures.c
binutils-000708-hypercom/bfd/archures.c
--- binutils-000708/bfd/archures.c Mon Jul 10 09:38:01 2000
+++ binutils-000708-hypercom/bfd/archures.c Mon Jul 10 10:15:25 2000
@@ -807,6 +807,18 @@
switch (number)
{
/* FIXME: These are needed to parse IEEE objects. */
+ /* The following seven case's are here only for compatibility with
+ older binutils (at least IEEE objects from binutils 2.9.1 require
+ these) */
+ case bfd_mach_m68000:
+ case bfd_mach_m68010:
+ case bfd_mach_m68020:
+ case bfd_mach_m68030:
+ case bfd_mach_m68040:
+ case bfd_mach_m68060:
+ case bfd_mach_cpu32:
+ arch = bfd_arch_m68k;
+ break;
case 68000:
arch = bfd_arch_m68k;
number = bfd_mach_m68000;
--
Alexander Aganichev
Software Engineer
Hypercom Europe Limited, Inc.