Re: Bug#62008: ld leaves hidden/internal symbols in the symbol table (Patch Included)

[Chip Salzenberg <chip at valinux dot com>]

According to Ulrich Drepper:
> > >       /* XXX: The ABI draft says the linker must turn hidden and
> > >          internal symbols into STB_LOCAL symbols when producing the
> > >          DSO. However, if ld.so honors st_other in the dynamic table,
> > >          this would not be necessary.  */
> 
> No!!!  This is wrong!  .hidden and .protected must jump through the
> PLT.  This is part of the whole plan.

I agree with you that making these symbols STB_LOCAL is a bad idea.
In fact, I considered that to be the bug and was planning to fix it
until I found the above comment and realized it was intentional.

If you could help me with info, please: What is this "ABI draft"
mentioned in the comment, where is it, and who's working on it?

> If it does not work with the current ld.so.: too bad.  This is brand
> new functionality.

Well, then, does libstdc++-v3 needs to check something more than gas
support before it uses '.hidden'?
-- 
Chip Salzenberg              - a.k.a. -              <chip@valinux.com>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
    but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early."  // MST3K