tutorial: fix poor wording in an exercise question

Reported-By: storypku at stackoverflow

diff --git a/doc/tutorial.tex b/doc/tutorial.tex
index 7b4fde505193ed188c6751aca31b8fde72ab83ea..eefbc05021a2c5e62ae4620500b746bb7d7280b2 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/tutorial.tex
+++ b/doc/tutorial.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-% Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Red Hat Inc.
+% Copyright (C) 2005-2013 Red Hat Inc.
 % This file is part of systemtap, and is free software.  You can
 % redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General
 % Public License (GPL); either version 2, or (at your option) any
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ probe kernel.function("*@net/socket.c").return {
   return now don't match anymore.  This is because now the first probe
   will match both normal function entry and inlined functions.  Try
   putting the \verb+.call+ modifier back and add another probe just for
-  \verb+probe kernel.function("*@net/socket.c").return+
+  \verb+probe kernel.function("*@net/socket.c").inline+
   What \verb+printf+ statement can you come up with in the probe handler
   to show the inlined function entries nicely in between the \verb+.call+
   and \verb+.return+ thread indented output?