Suppress -Wdangling-pointer for a construct that appears valid, but
one particular GCC snapshot version complains about.
In constructor ‘symresolution_info::symresolution_info(systemtap_session&, bool)’,
inlined from ‘int semantic_pass_symbols(systemtap_session&)’ at ../systemtap/elaborate.cxx:1872:28:
../systemtap/elaborate.cxx:2659:21: error: storing the address of local variable ‘sym’ in ‘*s.systemtap_session::symbol_resolver’ [-Werror=dangling-pointer=]
2659 | s.symbol_resolver = this; // save resolver for early PR25841 function resolution
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
../systemtap/elaborate.cxx: In function ‘int semantic_pass_symbols(systemtap_session&)’:
../systemtap/elaborate.cxx:1872:22: note: ‘sym’ declared here
1872 | symresolution_info sym (s);
| ^~~
../systemtap/elaborate.cxx:1870:43: note: ‘s’ declared here
1870 | semantic_pass_symbols (systemtap_session& s)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
symresolution_info::symresolution_info (systemtap_session& s, bool omniscient_unmangled):
session (s), unmangled_p(omniscient_unmangled), current_function (0), current_probe (0)
{
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic push
+ // c10s early snapshot GCC complains about this construct, which is
+ // made safe via our dtor usage
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-pointer"
saved_session_symbol_resolver = s.symbol_resolver;
s.symbol_resolver = this; // save resolver for early PR25841 function resolution
+ #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
}