Please update vi_VN locale. The old locale is not complete, especially on the
collating part. The new vi_VN is Mandrake's.
Created attachment 227 [details]
I'd have some cosmetic changes, to have the accents' order in the file
Created attachment 323 [details]
A patch to the previous vi_VN attachement, to reorder reordering in the accent
*** Bug 613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Excuse me. Is there any progress on this ?
Subject: Re: vi_VN locale update request
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:16:27PM -0000, pclouds at vnlinux dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pclouds at vnlinux dot org 2005-04-13 17:16 -------
> Excuse me. Is there any progress on this ?
Doesn't seem so. The patch seems fine to everybody, but nobody applied
it in mainstream...
The trunk has an updated locale definitions.
I have checked CVS. vi_VN (rev 1.7) differs from the attached vi_VN:
- r1.7 is older (2001-01-29 while this vi_VN is 2004-01-09)
- r1.7 missed some collation rules.
- one collation rule is wrong (<U1EB3> <a(>;<HOK>;<CAP>;IGNORE instead of
- yesstr/yesexpr (vâng) is kind of over-honorific. the new yesstr (có) is better
- r1.7 doens't have LC_NAME, LC_ADDRESS, LC_TELEPHONE
Therefore i would like to request applying new vi_VN over r1.7
What 1.7 version? I'm not going to go around hunting for the file you refer to.
I'm happy you're looking at this bug again :D
1.7 is the revision that you updated in comment #7. Here's the link
But then jakub has updated vi_VN in fedora-branch. I'm not using Fedora. However
I will look at fedora-branch version and take notes of differences between vi_VN
in this bug and fedora-branch's vi_VN.
Notes between this bug's vi_VN and fedora-branch's vi_VN:
revision: fedora-branch one's 0.7, this vi_VN's 1.1
fedora-branch one misses several collating rules: ạ, Ạ, ẽ, ẹ, Ẽ, Ẹ, ị, Ị, ọ, Ọ,
ụ, Ụ, ỳ, ỹ, ỵ, Ỳ, Ỹ, Ỵ.
fedora-branch has one mistake: line 115, that should be U1EB2 (Ẳ) instead of
this vi_VN's yesstr (Có) is preferable to fedora-branch's (Vâng) IMHO.
fedora-branch's misses LC_NAME and LC_TELEPHONE
There is no difference between fedora-branch and HEAD vi_VN.
So, if there is something incorrect in either of these versions (220.127.116.11 or 1.7),
please attach here a patch against those.
Created attachment 671 [details]
Attached the requested patch. I did point out what's wrong in previous comments
I applied thepatch to the trunk.