sparcv9 libm does not export an fdiml compat symbol prior to long double being a distinct type.
Presumably you mean 32-bit sparcv9 (since 64-bit sparc doesn't use ldbl-opt)? And presumably this is a recent regression, given that libm.abilist has both GLIBC_2.1 and GLIBC_2.4 fdiml symbols? In which case you should CC relevant people such as Aurelien.
Yes, sparcv9 32-bit. I suspect commit bf79a337ec86c2530edd26f4270f9688bf428ea2. I've pinged Aurelien via https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-08/msg00797.html .
I've fixed this with d47d27d
Please set target milestone when marking a bug as FIXED.