Summary: | DW_OP_value not supported | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | gdb | Reporter: | Jan Hubicka <hubicka> |
Component: | gdb | Assignee: | Tom Tromey <tromey> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | fche, gdb-prs, tromey |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | unknown | ||
Target Milestone: | 7.0 | ||
Host: | Target: | ||
Build: | Last reconfirmed: | 2009-06-20 16:37:59 |
Description
Jan Hubicka
2009-03-21 22:58:00 UTC
Yeah -- but I don't think DW_OP_value is in any released standard. I guess we could make DW_OP_GNU_value in the meantime, depending on how urgent this is. Subject: Re: DW_OP_value not supported
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:00:18AM -0000, tromey at redhat dot com wrote:
> Yeah -- but I don't think DW_OP_value is in any released standard.
> I guess we could make DW_OP_GNU_value in the meantime, depending
> on how urgent this is.
I think it's reasonable to take the value in the draft at this point;
it's marked as accepted, and while it could conceivably be backed out
(in fact it obsoleted an earlier extension to DWARF3), I don't think
it's likely. My two cents.
According to jakub, these may be the values: DW_OP_implicit_value 0x9e DW_OP_stack_value 0x9f Handy pointers: http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=070426.1&type=closed3 http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=071227.1&type=closed3 Apparently DW_OP_value was renamed DW_OP_stack_value. Working on a patch. I checked in the fix. |