Summary: | rewrite of LC_COLLATE of Spanish (es_ES) locale to make it simpler | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | glibc | Reporter: | Pablo Saratxaga <pablo> |
Component: | localedata | Assignee: | Petter Reinholdtsen <pere> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | drepper.fsp, glibc-bugs |
Priority: | P2 | Flags: | fweimer:
security-
|
Version: | 2.3.4 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Host: | Target: | ||
Build: | Last reconfirmed: | ||
Attachments: |
Complete es_ES version 4.5 locale file
Patch against current glibc es_ES locale |
Description
Pablo Saratxaga
2005-01-14 15:08:34 UTC
Created attachment 357 [details]
Complete es_ES version 4.5 locale file
Created attachment 358 [details]
Patch against current glibc es_ES locale
Pablo, I was in the process of submitting a large patch to include iso14651_t1 in several locales, I already reviewed ca_ES, da_DK, en_CA, es_ES, es_US, et_EE, fi_FI and nb_NO. I hope we are not duplicating a lot of work. Well, yes, it is duplicate work it seems... But when I queried for "es_ES" there was "zaroo bugs" :) The others locales fixes I commited are actual fixes and not a better rewrite of LC_COLLATE (I have such a rewrite for Turkish but haven't commited it yet; I also have a fix to vi_VN (the one in glibc has LC_COLLATE completly wrong, in fact it doesn't define anything at all) but haven't commited it yet either. If your new es_ES does the same thing as mine (eg, it has: LC_COLLATE copy "iso14651_t1" collating-symbol <ntilde> reorder-after <n> <ntilde> reorder-after <U006E> <U00F1> <ntilde>;<TIL>;<MIN>;IGNORE reorder-after <U004E> <U00D1> <ntilde>;<TIL>;<CAP>;IGNORE reorder-end END LC_COLLATE feel free to close this bug as duplicate. I do not include es_ES in my bugreport, there are no duplicates. My understanding is that n-tilde is a base letter in Spanish, so its 2nd level weight should be <BAS> and not <TIL>, shouldn't it? What about comment #5? No reply in 6+ months. Closing. |