Bug 5419

Summary: <<(fhpd break 10>> gets confusing
Product: frysk Reporter: Andrew Cagney <cagney>
Component: generalAssignee: Tim Moore <timoore>
Status: NEW ---    
Severity: normal    
Priority: P2    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Host: Target:
Build: Last reconfirmed:
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 2246, 5421    

Description Andrew Cagney 2007-11-27 19:52:43 UTC 
It says something about not defined.

A guess is that it is a syntax thing, perhaps #10 needs to be specified (it is
assuming 10 is the address or function name?)
Comment 1 Mark Wielaard 2007-12-05 16:03:07 UTC 
Possible extensions - is an integer better treated as an address or as a line
number?

(fhpd) break &10     -- breakpoint at address 10 (instead of gdb's *10????)
(fhpd) break 10      -- breakpoint at line 10 -> integer
(fhpd) break 10+1    -- breakpoint at line 11 -> integer
(fhpd) break 0x10    -- breakpoint at line 16 -> integer
(fhpd) break 1.0

The intent of the following is pretty clear:

(fhpd) break &function    -- break at function entry point
(fhpd) break function     -- break at function (possibly skipping prologue?????)

(fhpd) break &(function + 10)   -- breakpoint at &function + 10
(fhpd) break function + 10    -- ditto -> at "pointer address"
hint is:
(fhpd) print (function + 10)
(*)() 0x12234

(fhpd) break aclass::asubclass::overloadedfunction<int>(int)