Summary: | state "Attached.WaitForUnblock" did not handle handleRemoval | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | frysk | Reporter: | Mark Wielaard <mark> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Mark Wielaard <mark> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | mcvet |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Host: | Target: | ||
Build: | Last reconfirmed: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 3346 |
Description
Mark Wielaard
2006-12-12 14:27:08 UTC
Referenced from material in #3696. {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@2e43b60,pid=783,tid=785,state=Attached.WaitForUnblock} in state "Attached.WaitForUnblock" did not handle handleRemoval frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui) frysk.proc.TaskState.handleRemoval(FryskGui) frysk.proc.Task.performRemoval(FryskGui) frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc.sendRefresh(FryskGui) frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost.sendRefresh(FryskGui) frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHostState$1.handleRefresh(FryskGui) frysk.proc.Host$1.execute(FryskGui) frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui) frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui) frysk.gui.Gui$3.run(FryskGui) java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh) Just got another one, slightly different: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3967ceb5,pid=26079,tid=26079,state=blockedContinue} in state "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui) frysk.proc.TaskState.handleRemoval(FryskGui) frysk.proc.Task.performRemoval(FryskGui) frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc.sendRefresh(FryskGui) frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost.sendRefresh(FryskGui) frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHostState$1.handleRefresh(FryskGui) frysk.proc.Host$1.execute(FryskGui) frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui) frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui) frysk.gui.Gui$3.run(FryskGui) java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh) Issue in comment #1 should have been fixed by: 2007-03-28 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> * LinuxPtraceTaskState.java (attaching): Add handleUnblock, handleAddObservation and handleDeleteObservation. (Attached): Add handleTerminatedEvent. The issue in comment #2 is something different and I'll have opened a new bug #4298 for it. |