Bug 3691

Summary:	testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.TestFStack)
Product:	frysk	Reporter:	Andrew Cagney <cagney>
Component:	general	Assignee:	Nurdin Premji <npremji>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal	CC:	jan, npremji
Priority:	P2
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Host:		Target:
Build:		Last reconfirmed:
Bug Depends on:	3791
Bug Blocks:	2244, 3076

Description Andrew Cagney 2006-12-11 04:06:54 UTC

1)
testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Task #541
#0 0xc5a402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x0 in null ()
#2 0x804924a in ../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibexecdir/funit-child.c server
(): line #249
#3 0x8049c9e in ../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibexecdir/funit-child.c main
(): line #505
#4 0x0 in null ()
#5 0x8048d21 in _start ()
...

did not match: (Task #\d+\n#0 0x[\da-f]+ in __kernel_vsyscall \(\)\n#1
0x[\da-f]+ in (__)?sigsuspend \(\)\n#2 0x[\da-f]+ in ../../frysk/frysk-core/

Comment 1 Andrew Cagney 2006-12-11 04:08:29 UTC

	(testStressMultiThreadedDetach): Note broken - 3691.

Comment 2 Nurdin Premji 2006-12-11 21:40:03 UTC

Fixed

2006-12-11
frysk-core/frysk/util/CL
	* TestFStack.java: Stripped down regex's to just the common text between threads.
	(testClone): Re-enabled
	(testStressMultiThreadedDetach): Ditto.

Comment 3 Jan Kratochvil 2006-12-11 21:55:24 UTC

Sorry but those 0x0 entries look incorrect there.
What is the advocacy of their presence?  Currently libunwind even tries to hide
the 0x0 entries for teh `((void (*)(void))0)();' NULL-calling case.

Comment 4 Nurdin Premji 2007-01-11 22:02:31 UTC

Created bug #3863 for issues with what was previously random 0x0 null() bugs and
is now 0x.... [unknown]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3863 ***