Summary: | ../../gdb/regcache.c:1087: internal-error: void regcache_raw_supply(regcache, int, const void): Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers' failed. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | gdb | Reporter: | Andrew Paprocki <andrew> |
Component: | gdb | Assignee: | Not yet assigned to anyone <unassigned> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | critical | CC: | eldar.abusalimov, jeremip11, pedro |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | 8.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | 8.1 | ||
Host: | Target: | ||
Build: | Last reconfirmed: |
Description
Andrew Paprocki
2017-06-08 22:47:07 UTC
The bug appears to be here: #ifndef HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_FS_BASE { /* PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL is obsolete since 2.6.25, where the fs_base and gs_base fields of user_regs_struct can be used directly. */ unsigned long base; if (regnum == -1 || regnum == AMD64_FSBASE_REGNUM) { if (ptrace (PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL, tid, &base, ARCH_GET_FS) < 0) perror_with_name (_("Couldn't get segment register fs_base")); regcache_raw_supply (regcache, AMD64_FSBASE_REGNUM, &base); } if (regnum == -1 || regnum == AMD64_GSBASE_REGNUM) { if (ptrace (PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL, tid, &base, ARCH_GET_GS) < 0) perror_with_name (_("Couldn't get segment register gs_base")); regcache_raw_supply (regcache, AMD64_GSBASE_REGNUM, &base); } } #endif This code must be getting hit because the binary was built on a RHEL5 system with 2.6.18 kernel. The reg cache does not allow the pseudo registers into the cache: /* Construct a strictly RAW register cache. Don't allow pseudo's into the register cache. */ descr->nr_raw_registers = gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch); descr->sizeof_raw_register_status = gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch); This appears to be the commit: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=2735833d5fb220983d09770087b573fed5bf93cd It should be noted that modifying `configure` to force on `HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_FS_BASE` and `HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_GS_BASE` fixes this issue. For some reason the `configure` tests for `fs_base` and `gs_base` fail even though `sys/user.h` on RHEL5 has the fields defined in `user_regs_struct`. The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f517c1805ac50c64c2dbb086c16b3bcf33b15a89 commit f517c1805ac50c64c2dbb086c16b3bcf33b15a89 Author: Eldar Abusalimov <eldar.abusalimov@jetbrains.com> Date: Mon Jan 15 16:57:42 2018 +0300 configure: Fix test for fs_base/gs_base in <sys/user.h> Make <sys/types.h> be included prior to including <sys/user.h>. glibc versions older than 2.14 use __uintNN_t types within certain structures defined in <sys/user.h> probably assuming these types are defined prior to including the header. This results in the following `configure` feature test compilation error that makes it think that `struct user_regs_struct` doesn't have `fs_base`/`gs_base` fields, althouh it does. configure:13617: checking for struct user_regs_struct.fs_base configure:13617: gcc -c -g -O2 -I/linux/include conftest.c >&5 In file included from conftest.c:158:0: /usr/include/sys/user.h:32:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t cwd; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:33:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t swd; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:34:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t ftw; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:35:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t fop; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:36:3: error: unknown type name '__uint64_t' __uint64_t rip; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:37:3: error: unknown type name '__uint64_t' __uint64_t rdp; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:38:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t mxcsr; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:39:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t mxcr_mask; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:40:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t st_space[32]; /* 8*16 bytes for each FP-reg = 128 bytes */ ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:41:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t xmm_space[64]; /* 16*16 bytes for each XMM-reg = 256 bytes */ ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:42:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t padding[24]; ^ configure:13617: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h */ ... | /* end confdefs.h. */ | #include <sys/user.h> | | int | main () | { | static struct user_regs_struct ac_aggr; | if (ac_aggr.fs_base) | return 0; | ; | return 0; | } Recent glibc versions don't use typedef'ed int types in <sys/user.h>, thus allowing it to be included as is (glibc commit d79a9c949c84e7f0ba33e87447c47af833e9f11a). However there're still some distros alive that use older glibc, for instance, RHEL/CentOS 6 package glibc 2.12. Also affects PR gdb/21559: ../../gdb/regcache.c:1087: internal-error: void regcache_raw_supply(regcache, int, const void): Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers' failed. As noted by Andrew Paprocki, who submitted the PR (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21559#c3): > It should be noted that modifying `configure` to force on > `HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_FS_BASE` and > `HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_GS_BASE` fixes this issue. For some > reason the `configure` tests for `fs_base` and `gs_base` fail > even though `sys/user.h` on RHEL5 has the fields defined in > `user_regs_struct`. Note that this patch does NOT fix the root cause of PR gdb/21559, although now that `configure` properly detects the presence of the fields and sets HAVE_XXX accordingly, the execution takes another path, which doesn't lead to the assertion failure in question. gdb/ChangeLog: 2018-01-17 Eldar Abusalimov <eldar.abusalimov@jetbrains.com> PR gdb/21559 * configure.ac: Include <sys/types.h> prior to <sys/user.h> when checking for fs_base/gs_base fields in struct user_regs_struct. * configure: Regenerate. gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog: 2018-01-17 Eldar Abusalimov <eldar.abusalimov@jetbrains.com> PR gdb/21559 * configure.ac: Include <sys/types.h> prior to <sys/user.h> when checking for fs_base/gs_base fields in struct user_regs_struct. * configure: Regenerate. The gdb-8.1-branch branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6949085e3eaef536b2c76252452ec3e63e9f112c commit 6949085e3eaef536b2c76252452ec3e63e9f112c Author: Eldar Abusalimov <eldar.abusalimov@jetbrains.com> Date: Wed Jan 17 13:13:15 2018 +0000 configure: Fix test for fs_base/gs_base in <sys/user.h> Make <sys/types.h> be included prior to including <sys/user.h>. glibc versions older than 2.14 use __uintNN_t types within certain structures defined in <sys/user.h> probably assuming these types are defined prior to including the header. This results in the following `configure` feature test compilation error that makes it think that `struct user_regs_struct` doesn't have `fs_base`/`gs_base` fields, althouh it does. configure:13617: checking for struct user_regs_struct.fs_base configure:13617: gcc -c -g -O2 -I/linux/include conftest.c >&5 In file included from conftest.c:158:0: /usr/include/sys/user.h:32:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t cwd; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:33:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t swd; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:34:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t ftw; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:35:3: error: unknown type name '__uint16_t' __uint16_t fop; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:36:3: error: unknown type name '__uint64_t' __uint64_t rip; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:37:3: error: unknown type name '__uint64_t' __uint64_t rdp; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:38:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t mxcsr; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:39:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t mxcr_mask; ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:40:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t st_space[32]; /* 8*16 bytes for each FP-reg = 128 bytes */ ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:41:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t xmm_space[64]; /* 16*16 bytes for each XMM-reg = 256 bytes */ ^ /usr/include/sys/user.h:42:3: error: unknown type name '__uint32_t' __uint32_t padding[24]; ^ configure:13617: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h */ ... | /* end confdefs.h. */ | #include <sys/user.h> | | int | main () | { | static struct user_regs_struct ac_aggr; | if (ac_aggr.fs_base) | return 0; | ; | return 0; | } Recent glibc versions don't use typedef'ed int types in <sys/user.h>, thus allowing it to be included as is (glibc commit d79a9c949c84e7f0ba33e87447c47af833e9f11a). However there're still some distros alive that use older glibc, for instance, RHEL/CentOS 6 package glibc 2.12. Also affects PR gdb/21559: ../../gdb/regcache.c:1087: internal-error: void regcache_raw_supply(regcache, int, const void): Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers' failed. As noted by Andrew Paprocki, who submitted the PR (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21559#c3): > It should be noted that modifying `configure` to force on > `HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_FS_BASE` and > `HAVE_STRUCT_USER_REGS_STRUCT_GS_BASE` fixes this issue. For some > reason the `configure` tests for `fs_base` and `gs_base` fail > even though `sys/user.h` on RHEL5 has the fields defined in > `user_regs_struct`. Note that this patch does NOT fix the root cause of PR gdb/21559, although now that `configure` properly detects the presence of the fields and sets HAVE_XXX accordingly, the execution takes another path, which doesn't lead to the assertion failure in question. gdb/ChangeLog: 2018-01-17 Eldar Abusalimov <eldar.abusalimov@jetbrains.com> PR gdb/21559 * configure.ac: Include <sys/types.h> prior to <sys/user.h> when checking for fs_base/gs_base fields in struct user_regs_struct. * configure: Regenerate. gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog: 2018-01-17 Eldar Abusalimov <eldar.abusalimov@jetbrains.com> PR gdb/21559 * configure.ac: Include <sys/types.h> prior to <sys/user.h> when checking for fs_base/gs_base fields in struct user_regs_struct. * configure: Regenerate. Fix merged. Thanks. (In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #6) > Fix merged. Thanks. Pedro, I'm not sure we should actually close this ticket. The merged patch makes the issue go away indeed, however it doesn't fix the root cause of the assertion failure, I'm afraid. > Note that this patch does NOT fix the root cause of PR gdb/21559, > although now that `configure` properly detects the presence of the > fields and sets HAVE_XXX accordingly, the execution takes another > path, which doesn't lead to the assertion failure in question. |