Summary: | cgg Chiga (Rukiga, Ruchiga, or Kiga maybe) missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | glibc | Reporter: | Christoph Miebach <no.se.spam> |
Component: | localedata | Assignee: | Not yet assigned to anyone <unassigned> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | bluebat, cjlhomeaddress, libc-locales |
Priority: | P2 | Flags: | fweimer:
security-
|
Version: | 2.15 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Host: | Target: | ||
Build: | Last reconfirmed: | ||
Attachments: | add language code: cgg |
Description
Christoph Miebach
2012-04-16 10:40:43 UTC
It is present in the ISO-639_3.pot http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=iso-codes/iso-codes.git;a=blob;f=iso_639_3/iso_639_3.pot;h=e13ab478f2cdb62bb107f7213906c6712a756dba;hb=HEAD#l6025 So request for locale cgg_RW and/or cgg_UG. (In reply to 趙惟倫 from comment #2) > So request for locale cgg_RW and/or cgg_UG. No the report is correct that this code is not present in the isop-639.def validator, so creating a locale would not be possible until that is fixed. Created attachment 7200 [details]
add language code: cgg
But why there is "yue_HK" locale without "yue" language code in iso-639.def?
(In reply to 趙惟倫 from comment #4) > Created attachment 7200 [details] > add language code: cgg > > But why there is "yue_HK" locale without "yue" language code in iso-639.def? Good question, I did not confirm an error generation on iso-639.def check, but I recently encountered one on a currency code check (iso-4127.def), so I assumed you'd see one for lang code not present, but maybe not. fixed by commit 354a7a548f00f6963e3d85a8244b61fbdb261936 |