Summary: | Request to deprecate namespace-polluting cruft in headers with _GNU_SOURCE | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | glibc | Reporter: | Rich Felker <bugdal> |
Component: | libc | Assignee: | Not yet assigned to anyone <unassigned> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | drepper.fsp |
Priority: | P2 | Flags: | fweimer:
security-
|
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Host: | Target: | ||
Build: | Last reconfirmed: |
Description
Rich Felker
2012-04-07 02:17:11 UTC
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, bugdal at aerifal dot cx wrote: > - lots more... > Note that this bug report/enhancement request is really a matter of glibc's > documentation and future direction policy rather than a request for any > immediate source-level changes. If you want specific changes, "lots more" isn't helpful information about those changes. If you want to discuss policy regarding legacy APIs, libc-alpha would be a better place than Bugzilla to discuss the general question of reconsidering whether interfaces from BSD and SVID, that are not in POSIX, belong in the _GNU_SOURCE API or not. If there's support for reconsidering some such interfaces, then individual bugs could be filed in Bugzilla for each case that someone thinks should be removed from the _GNU_SOURCE API (the developers may end up disagreeing with some of those cases; separate bugs for each case are best to avoid entangling consideration of one API with that of other APIs). Also: any patch that removes a symbol from the _GNU_SOURCE API certainly needs to be tested with building GCC with the patched glibc, given the issues we've had with the removal of gets from _GNU_SOURCE and various POSIX namespace fixes. As discussed on libc-alpha and now documented at <http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Bugzilla%20Procedures>, please take general policy questions and open-ended projects to libc-alpha. If discussions there conclude that a particular enumerated set of APIs is obsolete for _GNU_SOURCE, a bug could be filed for removing that set, but it would need to list the complete set that had been agreed to be obsolete, with no open-ended "lots more..."> |