This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: generalized unique element


tried doing something like..
<xsl:if test="not(name(.) = preceding::node()/name())">


the / operator has to have path expressions not functions that return a
string, like name(). You want the second name() to be like te first,
taking the node as argument.

name(preceding::node())

unfortunately you then can't use the magic property of = to test all
elements of a node set, so you then need to use a predicate,something
like

<xsl:variable name="n" select="name(.)"/>
<xsl:if test="preceding::*[name(.)=$n]">


You mentioned though the "Meunchian method" which does
the same using keys which will be quicker on large data sets


David


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]