This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Hello World
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:15:01 +0100
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Hello World
- References: <62E66E667580D61187160004762FCBFA0B34@MA-ATL81>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
but element (the only element, therefore also the doc ele) is not defined as
a stylesheet element its an "a" element that has an xslt 1.0 namespace
declaration within its context ... but it doesn't belong to the namespace
nor is it an xslt stylesheet element.
So is the xslt version attribute declaration still needed?
Yes that's the second case (2.3) in the message of mine that you quoted.
I called it "simplified syntax" teh spec calls it "literal result
element as stylesheet". In this case you need an xsl:version attribute.
(as opposed to the version attribute on xsl:stylesheet)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list