This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT performance under Linux
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:15:02PM -0700, Kurt Cagle wrote:
> I would recommend working with the xsltproc engine. It's C++ based, supports
> a healthy subset of the Saxon parser, and is fast. I had something of a
> jury-rigged system where I was calling saxon as a jar from the command line
> (invoked from an `` expression in perl) and my system was crawling despite
> being on a top of the line computer. I replaced it with xsltproc, and it was
> a couple of orders of magnitude faster. It should be in most recent Linux
> distros, though it's also up on Source Forge.
Hum, is there another xsltproc out there ? The one I work on is in C
and hosted at http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ (the CVS base is the one from
the GNOME project).
If it's the same, thanks for your positive review :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list