This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: attribute order
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:00:31 GMT
- Subject: Re: [xsl] attribute order
- References: <001101c1bb8c$387ee3a0$66c469d5@pcukmka>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> (There is universal consensus that in XML, element order is important but
> attribute order isn't. There is nothing explicit in the XML specification
> that says this, but it's made clear in the definition of the InfoSet.)
Actually a sentence making this explicit was added in XML 2e:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006-review.html#sec-starttags
... Note that the order of attribute specifications in a start-tag or
empty-element tag is not significant.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list