This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael dot h dot kay at ntlworld dot com>
- To: <naha at ai dot mit dot edu>, <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>, "'Michael Kay'" <michael dot h dot kay at ntlworld dot com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:04:16 -0000
- Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> I might be misunderstanding you, but it seems to me that given that
> the user is writing a wrapper function, they should be putting that
> wrapper function in their own namespace rather than the one for
> Saxon extensions. So this is consistent with or supports the idea
> of the processor giving an error when one of its extension functions
> are redefined.
Of course they should use their own namespace. But when writing the spec, we
have to say what happens if they don't.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list