This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re: RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...



> The only way XSLT gives you to deal with that problem is to
> make *every* of those layout parameters explicit parameters
> to *every* template.

"only" ?


if they are fixed for a given run as is probably the case for your
text width example, then they can be "global variablesd (or parameters).

Also if you find declaring loits of parameters inconvenient you always
have the option of just declaring one tree valued parameter and
extracting whatever data you need from that. (This is easier to set up
in xslt 2.0 draft but is also perfectly possible in xslt 1.0)

I'm not saying dynamic scope is necessarily a bad idea, although I don't
think it would fit so easily into the current xslt design, but your
arguments for adding such a feature are not strengthened if you
over-state the problems with the current design. 

David
 


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]