This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
A paranoic XPath 2.0 question
- From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila at systinet dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:08:33 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 question
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I have noticed that as editors there are listed
4 people from XML Query WG
3 people from XSL WG
If there is some point reised which requires voting, what is the
procedure?
Does it mean that votes are simpli counted.
I am browsing through the spec and have feeling that
XPath went the way of XML Schema:
databases are much more important than text processing
And BTW:
WHERE ARE REGULAR EXPRESSIONS ??????????, which were promissed :
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20req :
3. Must Support String Matching Using Regular Expressions
--
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>
<surname> Nic </surname>
<mail> nicmila@systinet.com </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org </support>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list