This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is being displayed as Á
- From: "Julian Reschke" <julian dot reschke at gmx dot de>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:35:53 +0100
- Subject: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is being displayed as Á
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Burges
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:17 PM
> To: David Carlisle
> Subject: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is
> being displayed as Á
>
>
>
> >> I don't understand. When I put the output into IE it displays " ". The
>
> DC> in that case you must have used disable-output-encoding,
> without telling
> DC> us.
>
> Yes sorry, I forgot to write that in the post.
>
> DC> Searching the archives of this list will show you plenty of
> DC> messages discussing d-o-e, and why usually it's a bad idea.
>
> I've been reading most of the posts, and I understand why in most
> cases it is bad. I don't particularly see why it is bad in my
> example where I just want to create a   in an HTML file so it can
> be understood easier by IE.
For instance, it won't work in Mozilla.
Why not just stick with the portable method?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list