This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Trying to find a working XSLT processor
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Trying to find a working XSLT processor
- From: "David Rosenborg" <david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:29:21 +0200
- References: <4.2.0.58.20010906110239.01e0b7f0@pop1.attglobal.net>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Hi,
I believe it's not so much the XSLT processor as the XML parser.
I got your example to work with a noname-XSLT-processor
using XP (www.jclark.com/xml/xp/) as the parser (XT uses XP by default).
So if you can find a Java based XSLT implementation which supports SAX 1.0
you should be able to plug XP in. Also there is a SAX 1.0 -> SAX 2.0 adapter in the SAX 2.0
package so it shouldn't take too much tweeking to get it running
with a XSLT processor only accepting SAX 2.0 parsers.
This is not a ready-to-run answer, but I hope it helps anyway.
Cheers,
</David>
David Rosenborg
Pantor Engineering AB
> Can someone help me find an XSLT processor that works with the following XML?
>
> If someone has another command-line processor than the ones listed above,
> could they please try the test and let me know if there is one that
> works? One additional requirement is that I need to be able to pass
> parameters to the XSLT processor on the command line, so I cannot use a
> DLL-only solution.
>
> Thanks for any help you can be!
>
> ................ Ken
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list